Product: Toshiba PSAT0U-00J001

List Price: No List Price Available
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Toshiba PSAT0U-00J001

Before I go ahead with my review, I want to mention that I did not bewitch this laptop from Amazon. I paid the same amount as Amazon.

I have a Desktop that I built about 2 years ago with, what were at the time, Top of the line components. This laptop comes Extremely conclude to my behemoth of a Desktop in performance. The Amazon description of the product covers it's specifications fairly well. As such i will not go into detail of what this product has or doesn't have. I will be reviewing it's capabilities and it's performance.

I noticed that the 2 reviewers before me mentioned a couple of things that they were unsure of. I will acknowledge those questions.

1. This laptop does not have Bluetooth, nor does it have the built in Antennas for you to add a bluetooth card. That is not a mammoth deal as many USB bluetooth adapters cost $10-$30.

2. The timing of the Backlighting for the keyboard can be controlled in the bios.

If you are wondering whether to settle this laptop over another one with the "T6600". I suggest you decide this one. I will elaborate why. Although the "T6600" is 2.2GHZ, it is usually running at a slower Clock rate of 800Mhz. This processor, specifically in this laptop, is running at 2.13Ghz at a clock rate of 1066MHZ which will throw out very end numbers in a benchmark. This Processor is also designed with a lower TDP wattage. Which in turn means a longer battery life.

Since the bus is running at 1066Mhz, the memory that is keep into this laptop (DDR3) is running at a matched clock rate. This brings this to an 'almost' enthusiast level of computing. For the effect, it is an wonderful deal.

T6600 is cheaper than the P7450, and most average users will behold higher clock rate for cheaper and go with T6600. Which is why i explained the contrast above.

The onboard video chipset in this laptop is a Nvidia 230M, which is the bottom of their enthusiast level Graphics chipsets. I will build it this blueprint, it is absolutely astonishing how gracious this chipset is. I have two SLI 8800GTX Ultras in my desktop which cost me almost twice as distinguished as this laptop's note 2 years ago. I mild haven't hurry into a game that has brought them down to their SLI'd knees and honestly i wasn't expecting this laptop to even near finish to their prowess. It hasn't, but It's legal at their tails. I downloaded some of NVIDIAs tech demos. I ran the 8800Ultra graphics demo and it ran at fat native resolution of this laptop without a hitch. I have to say i was pleasently surprised. I also downloaded the 200 series tech demo and it ran as well, at about 15 or so Frames Per Second. Which is Unbelievable because these tech demos are made to bring out the elephantine potential of their top of the line cards and for the chipset to even rush these demos at more than 15 Frames per second simply means that you will have NO problems playing any of today's games at their burly graphical settings.

It comes with Windows 7 Home premium 64bit. You can easily upgrade that within the OS to any of the higher editions but for most regular users, the Home Premium is more than enough.

I do have to agree with the bloatware. Although the bloatware isn't quite as useless and cumbersome as some of the other laptop manufacturers it detached hinders the experience; atleast that's my understanding.

The keyboard keys are, in my thought a tad bit bigger than a regular burly sized keyboard. Yet are not clicky like a regular desktop keyboard, which sometimes makes it a microscopic bit harder to know or feel your plot around the keys. Although it doesn't hinder in anyway from performing any regular internet related tasks. I would suspect that people would have disaster with the keyboard at first if they are doing a lot of word processing but it shouldn't be too hard to pick up primitive to.

My least celebrated section of this laptop is the touch pad. The touchpad is off to the left a exiguous bit instead of being in the center like in most normal laptops. Also it is flush with the bezel of the laptop for stunning reasons. The touch pad does have a different texture then the rest of the laptop so it's not hard to collect it if you are not looking at it. The left and moral click buttons are also extremely gigantic, which is a turn off for me personally. But some people might like that. I own the touchpad is also something that will rob a bit of getting outmoded to.

The speakers are fairly nice. I am not an audiophile and if you are buying a laptop for it's audio prowess then you should end honest now. A 1 lope speaker will never be as friendly as a plump sized computer speaker or other Home Audio equipment. Although for being so itsy-bitsy, they do sound very sterling. I am not disappointed with the speakers.

Overall this laptop is a prefer for the designate that it is going for suitable now, I would give this laptop a 8 out of 10.

Hopefully My review was agreeable. If you have any questions, please comment and I will try to answer in a timely manner.

Thank you

I waited until Windows 7 launches before purchasing a laptop. Ordered on 22th, shipped the next day (even with FSSS), got it on the 26th. First impression was that it looks very slick with high glossy accomplish. If you want a decent desktop replacement to play movies, urge memory intensive programs, and play games.. than this would be more than enough.

When I was looking for a laptop, I looked at 3 things:

- Processor: 2.13 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 processor -> benchmark tests comparable to 2.20 GHz P6600, but will place 10% power on maximum performance...

- Memory: 4 GB of RAM, DDR3; 1066 MHz -> I rush photoshop and cakewalk heavily.. this would be more than sufficient

- Graphic cards: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M graphics with 1 GB GDDR3 -> this is really well-behaved.. even for graphic intensive gaming like Crysis... let's objective leave it at that..

I was playing with it the whole afternoon yesterday and found some stuff:

Pros / Cons

- Like another reviewer here mentioned, there's a lot of junk programs installed.. I'm thinking of removing them, buat maybe I'll honest leave it there for a while

- For some reason performance can be lazy at times... browsing with IE gives lags from keyboard to monitor... I switched to Chrome and it seems faster.. need to do further research

- Played music on itunes and it skips once in a while... again.. needs to do further testing.. maybe my configuration isn't optimal

- the touch pad is wayyy on the left side of the keyboard... since I'm aged to the touchpad in the middle.. it's kinda ackward at times.. but I'm distinct I'll adjust to it..

- burly keyboard!! I care for it!

- harman/kardon speakers.. not totally dapper (you can here distortion at times at chunky volume) but VERY Respectable for laptop speakers..

- mild trying to fetch out if this has bluetooth or not... the specs didn't say anything, but looking around I found programs installed for bluetooth.. needs to do more testing

- urge windows 7 flawlessly

Suggestions:

Do not regain the one with the blu-ray drive.. you won't witness the quality between normal DVDs and Blu Rays on shrimp shroud anyways... and it costs ~$250 more... of course you also secure bigger battery that can lasts you ~5 hours.. but reflect about it, would you really need it?

I've been researching around and trust me this is the best option if you have the same needs as mine (search for beginning of review)

Watch Video Here: http://www.amazon.com/review/RZHK7BV427WD I unbiased got this computer on Saturday and all I can say is, if you are looking for a well-behaved desktop replacement/media/gaming laptop, im distinct this is for you. The 16in TFT show is extremely incandescent and crisp, and even on its lowest brightness setting it can detached be easily seen in incandescent lights with minimal glare. The lighted keyboard is really handy, although I can't seem to be able to change the amount of time that it stays on. The touchpad is nice and responsive, and multi-touch is really handy for photo editing, etc. It sometime gets in the arrangement if you accidentally rest a finger on it while enchanting the cursor. /the touch controls on the top of the keyboard are realy nice, and along with the media/volume controls, it also has an 'eco-button' which lowers the power consumption of the laptop. The speakers are astounding, not gigantic bass but what are you to seek information from from 1in speakers? They aren't too tinny and sound gargantuan even at loud volumes, and i can squawk you, for laptop speakers, these suckers are loud! Win7 pre-installed is a nice touch, but Toshiba also decided to install alot of Microsoft and it's fill bloat ware, not a tremendous inform, but most of it isn't indispensable.

Product: DEWALT DC925KA

List Price: $535.98
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on DEWALT DC925KA

This is the drill you want if you never want to select another drill of this size and power again. Provided you don't care that it may be a minute banged up (witch it will become if you do "really expend it") . This drill plot and case easily retailed over $250. The hammer setting is perfect for making little holes (say 1/4" or less) in masonry for anchors or drilling limited to medium size holes for what ever reason in hard materials (having a bit centered and for a high blows per microscopic drill helps too!) . This drill can easily develop 5/8 holes in 1/2 wafer board and 2/4's with a (engaging) auger bit no quandary . It has plenty of torque and (with the XRP bat) battery life for anything you logically consider it would handle. 3 speeds to let you fool around with how fleet you want to go. It can handle brick dust and being dropped on the ground as well as hanging on a ladder from the chuck. I have seen this particular dewalt drill spot (and the one without a hammer setting) obsolete steal many in the construction field.

This is a astronomical deal and should not be passed up for someone who needs to select a fine quality light-heavyduty drill once.

I old-fashioned my weak DW955 for all-around construction. That drill had only 2 speeds uninteresting for setting screws and faster for drilling. It started to intermittently halt on me after several years usage.

I bought a original DC925KA as a replacement. I won't spend the hammer drill function everyday but for a few bucks more it was worth the "insurance" if and when I needed it.

This unit on tiring, run HAS NO CLUTCH. Almost useless as a driver.

The other 2 speeds (which for my money are insignificantly different) both offer the clutch.

Lots a power for drilling though.

If your main usage for this tool is 50% drilling and 50% setting screws your wasting your money.

Also when shifting from 1 rush to another be prepared to gain it into the next gear with a tiny amount of power. Almost like double clutching for you frail stick shift guys.

I'm getting my DW955 repaired and you may accumulate my DC925 on eBay.

One day at the job dwelling, a coworker informed me that he owed me a original drill. Consuming, I asked "Why"? He told me that he had accidentally dropped my Dewalt drill/driver into a water filled obtain basin and it was tranquil in there.

I ran over to where the gain basin was, saw my drill down in the dim depths, and went in head first to retrieve it. Retrieving the drill was easy enough, but extracting myself from the deep and narrow derive basin, with one hand on my drill, my feet in the air and my head pointing towards China, was proving to be a bit more difficult. Fortunately for me, the fellow who dropped the drill in the collect basin in the first plot, Large John, happened to be a 6'6" giant and was able to pull me out by my ankles.

After taking a moment to remind myself to always have an exit strategy in any future power tool rescue attempts (lest there be no around to yank on my ankles) I took my waterlogged drill and ran over to my car. I disconnected the battery from the drill, establish both pieces on top of the defrost vents on my scamper board, and cranked the defrost on chubby blast for about half an hour (I had the temperature situation on crude so that the battery wouldn't explode) .

Well, as you may have guessed from my 5-star rating, the Dewalt worked perfectly after that episode, and quiet works perfectly today, three years later. The water episode, in and of itself, isn't enough to rate 5 stars; it is all the exercise, abuse, and neglect that the drill endures that really impresses me. I utilize larger spade and auger bits than it is rated for when there are no corded drills around. I have mixed drywall mud with it, drilled lots of holes in concrete (again with larger bits than what it is rated for), drilled holes in steel and stainless steel, and driven perambulate bolts. It typically lives on the job station floor several days out of the week. I would say that Dewalt hit the nail on the head when they designed this product, but that doesn't seem a fitting metaphor for a drill, does it?

There are several companies that effect a titanic hammer drill/driver, and I can't say which is really the best. What I can say is that I never feel regret at buying this Dewalt, or peruse at another company's 18 volt drill and wish that I had bought that designate instead. I am completely overjoyed with this product.

Product: All-Clad 6508 SS

List Price: No List Price Available
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on All-Clad 6508 SS

This is my celebrated stockpot.

The copper makes it the most even heating stock pot I have ever extinct. It holds heat well, so it doesn't loose heat as speedy as an aluminum or aluminum core pot does -- which can have difficulty when frying because the aluminum cools snappily.

It works sizable for deep frying, oven roasting, making all types of soups, stews, stocks, etc.

It is pricey, but really does work better for me than the less expensive aluminum core models.

I received this stockpot for christmas - Given the brand mark of this item ($450) one would examine this to be perfect craftsmanship. Not so, the conceal didn't fit quite lawful. It snugged down into the pan and wobbled, unlike the Copper-Core sauce pan I already owned where the veil sits on top. I called Williams-Sonoma, the site of bewitch. They had no understanding what I was talking about but said they would gladly refund. So the pan was returned and I ordered another from Chefs Catalog hoping I impartial got a abominable pan. Same jam - I then called All-Clad directly. Customer service had no belief what I was talking about, they were under the impression the conceal was the same as their sauce pans. They promised to check this out and rep relieve to me. They never did. I sent an email to customer service, but never got a retort. I called Chefs catalog, they said they would investigate this, but it would catch a week. I never heard from them again. I called All-Clad again - and was told to effect the mask and the pot to scrutinize if it was out of round... I did this but it was very difficult to yell given that the tolerance for out of round would be so itsy-bitsy. I called All-Clad again, explained my frustration and they told me they would check into this. They did call me benefit the same day this time, and told me the wobbling of the pan cloak was normal. So I lived with this...

After a couple of months I called All-Clad again, it honest didn't perform sense to me that the veil should fit this scheme. Customer service told me that there was a awful batch of pans that were out of round. They told me to send it support. They also told me to set aside the mailing receipt in the box and they would reimburse for shipping. I received a unique pan yesterday. The screen fits perfectly - it's exactly the same as the sauce pan. I did not gather reimbursed for the shipping -

Overall this is a gargantuan pan - but the lack of customer succor is appalling, both from the sellers of this product and the manufacturer. You would believe that when buying top of the line products you would salvage better service - I doubt I'll catch another All-Clad product - There's too many other righteous quality products out there -

This pot was purchased as a replacement for a 25-year-old Calphalon classic anodized aluminum stock pot of the same size that had always performed satisfactorily (it had honest gotten ratty-looking and, frankly, I wanted to treat myself) . I cook a lot of soups, stews, and one pot meals and so I consume a pot of this size regularly. I am thoroughly impressed at its ample performance characteristics. It heats very evenly and I can saute vegetables worthy longer before I have a scrape with them burning. The pot is easy to tidy and I have been putting it in the dishwasher will no ill carry out. The only down side to this pot is the impress, but I put a question to it to last for at least the 25 years that my Calphalon pot did, so it will pay for itself over time.

Product: Vutec ELF5089MG

List Price: $625.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Vutec ELF5089MG

Purchased this shroud for our in home media room and it's awesome. It took less than 15 minutes to assemble after reading the instructions and less than 30 minutes to measure and mount on the wall (one person) . We purchased a 720p, 16:9 projector for this veil. What a perfect combination. We are extremely delighted with our recall and would recommend this cloak to others.

Product: Green Star GS1000

List Price: $459.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Green Star GS1000

I've been juicing since the early 1990s and more recently, as a certified raw foods associate chef, have been preparing a wider range of juicer recipes including pates and ice cream from frozen bananas. I have experience with Green Star, Champion, Juiceman, and several other juicers, and have read quite a bit about various models of juicers. If you are going to be juicing a lot of greens such as kale and parsley, the Green Star will give you a better and more nutritious yield than any juicer on the market. It far exceeds masticating juicers such as the Champion in this regard, as well as centrifugal juicers such as the Juiceman. A mammoth succor of Green Star is that it juices wheat grass, so you will not need a dedicated wheat grass juicer. It's also amazingly calm, far quieter (and a bit slower) than my Champion. And like the Champion, it does a grand job with pates, frozen ice cream, and other recipes requiring a homogenizing blade, also known as a "blank." With a slower bustle, the juice does not heat up as distinguished as with a Champion and oxidizes slower.

So is there a find? Yes. There are far more parts to assemble, disassemble, and trim than with a Champion. I'm reminded of the time when my brother was a child, he asked to borrow my father's seek, and my father said, "certain." A few days later, my father wanted his stare encourage, and entered my brothers room to win a bazillion tiny pieces on the floor: gears, springs, etc. My brother explained that he wanted the gawk so he could seize it apart, but not to grief he said, "I'll keep it abet together." My father said, "don't concern about it, you can maintain the inspect." When I occupy apart a Green Star juicer, I always believe of this myth because it has so many more parts than a Champion. (Although fortunately, the Green Star is far easier to assemble and disassemble than an analog leer.:-) At the Living Light Culinary Institute where I trained as a raw foods chef, when we made pates and banana ice cream, we always reached for the Champion, not the Green Star.

In deciding whether to bewitch a Green Star juicer, reflect whether you are going to be juicing a lot of greens and/or wheatgrass, and whether you're really going to assume the time to disassemble, natty, and assemble about a dozen parts each time you consume it. If you're not achieve off by that, then I highly recommend the Green Star. If you are mostly considering a juicer for carrot juice, fruit juices, banana ice cream and pates, then I would steer you towards the Champion. If you want to exercise a juicer for all of the above and can afford and have the status for both, then I enthusiastically recommend both.

Note that there are 3 models of Green Star juicers, of which the GS1000 is their most basic model. The GreenStar.com website explains the various accessories that near with or can be purchased with each. Accessories such as pasta makers and mochi makers are available for assume with the GS1000, but are included with the GS3000.

I've been juicing for 20 years. My description of the Green Star 1000 is based on my experience with an passe Champion, a original Champion, and an customary Wheateena grass juicer. The Green Star spits pulp out the kill so you can juice continuously impartial like the other juicers. The pulp discharged is always quite dry and completely shredded and it extracts a maximum amount of very high quality juice from everything it juices well. Exceptions are described below. It leaks a limited juice into the pulp at the very open of juicing, like any juicer, which you can feed relieve through, of course. It has a nice glass pitcher. It didn't leak any juice onto the counter or spray carrot fiber out the discharge all over the counter like my Champion. It runs very smooth, unlike the Champion, and doesn't require any messy greasing before expend like the other juicers. It has a convenient handle and storage compartment for the electrical cord. It never bogged down under load like my Champion does when juicing carrots. It has never gotten hot. Frigid fruits and vegetables produced icy juice, unlike my other juicers. It is a refined juicer with a nice fit and conclude. It has a five year warranty on the expensive motor and gears. It has a gracious reputation so I take it will be very respectable like my Champion. They require the warranty to be received within 10 days of recall, so if you assume it online, you should exhaust it and register it factual away. You can register it online at their website.

I almost exclusively juice only four things (carrots, red bell peppers, cucumbers, and lettuce), so I'll picture those that matter to me first.

I find 2 1/4 cups of juice from 2 lbs of carrots, which is definitely better than my Champion. The juice is very high quality (as obliging as your carrots) . The square chute is gigantic enough for all but monster carrots. My only complaint is that carrots especially hold a lot of downward force to push through the juicer. I don't really mind, but it could be a demonstrate stopper for some people. The off white plastic juicer parts stain very rapid from carrots, though this doesn't bother me. The Champion requires considerable less danger but doesn't extract as noteworthy juice. The Champion also is very noisy and leaks juice and sprays carrot fiber all over the counter. The Champion bogs down easily on carrots, but the commercial motor version probably fixes that pickle.

The Green Star also does an honorable job on bell peppers. It takes a beautiful amount of pressure to push them through, too, but I derive 2 cups of juice from 1 1/2 lbs of peppers with very dry, shredded pulp discharged. There is a microscopic pulp in the juice, but that's ok with me. The Champion is not very efficient and produces quite a bit of foam. My grass juicer doesn't extract as noteworthy juice as the Green Star.

I juice lettuce because it is thirst quenching and is a nice milk substitute with meals and for taking vitamins. Lettuce is also somewhat hard to push through with the Green Star, but chopped chunks and leaves, that are awkward on the other juicers, feed through conveniently and without spilling into the juice pitcher and counter. It spits dry, shredded pulp out the discharge and puts very miniature foam in the juice. It is splendid to my grass juicer and far great to the Champion.

The Green Star was extremely impressive on cucumbers. Both my Champion and grass juicer backup very hasty, becoming unusable, and spitting out very wet pulp. Cucumbers had to be quartered lengthwise like the other juicers but pushed through easily and juiced with very minute foam and produced very dry, finely ground pulp out the discharge.

The Green Star does an outstanding job on these juices which I build all the time, but I have found it to be significantly worse than my other juicers on other fruits and vegetables.

It is usable for celery and juices it easily and doesn't wind the fibers around the cutter and clog up like my Champion, but it does form some foam. I would exhaust a dedicated grass/greens juicer for celery.

It produces lots of foam and very limited juice from spinach. I would stick with a dedicated grass juicer for spinach and other leafy greens. Wheatgrass would also probably juice very badly on the Green Star.

It backed up, becoming unusable, after only a couple of oranges. The grass juicer was almost as poor. The Champion is honorable for citrus, especially if you like the rich, heavy Orange Julius type juice.

Grapes backed up even worse than oranges. My grass juicer is very efficient with grapes, spitting fairly dry pulp out the discharge.

The Green Star was usable for apples but is significantly worse than the Champion. The feed chutes is obviously exiguous in the case of apples. Even medium size apples will have to be gash into six pieces. Foam isn't too dreadful if you juice very slowly and launch juicing the apples before anything else, like carrots, that will open clogging the filter. There is lots of pulp in the juice (probably more than you want) and apples are hard to push through.

For my juices the Green Star wins easily. It works equally well on hard carrots and soft cucumbers, bell peppers, and lettuce. I don't have to compromise juicing ability by using the base juicer for some juices or consume and dapper two juicers at the same time. The Green Star is easy to assemble, but it is a staunch chore to tidy up all the parts, especially scrubbing the semi cylindrical filter camouflage inside and outside. I drink juices daily so I perform all my juices about twice a week, which retain very well in the frig. The Champion is significantly better for most fruits and is mighty easier to smart. A grass juicer will be far better for spinach, other leafy greens, and grasses.

Which juicer you settle will depend on which kinds of fruits and vegetables you will be juicing. You may have to consume more than one.

Product: Makita BDF451

List Price: $538.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Makita BDF451

Over the years i have weak nearly every effect of cordless tool imaginable. There has always been advantages and disadvantages to each. Not with the Makita LXT line though. I have the Drill/Driver and the impact driver and each is everything advertised. They are lighter than other 18v models. They are tough, the battery charge lasts at least twice as long as any I have ever worn and four times longer than the craftsman I upgraded from. If you can swallow the note, rob this tool it is worth every penny.

I have old-fashioned Craftsman, Ryobi, DeWalt and Makita from 7-18 volts. Makita has again produced a tough, handy make.

But somehow the Amazon product description slipped on the features. Makita specs for the BDF451 point to NO hammer on this drill. Unlike the drill, the lithium packs are warranted for only 1 year. Standard divulge.

Compared to my ragged 18 volt DeWalt XRP hammerdrill/driver (which is not balanced and won't stand on its battery) this drill does not pump my forearm like Popeye's after about half an hour.

I wish I could say it outperforms the DeWalt in every scheme. I expected more torque. Wrong, I guess.

But, the lithium ion charges last about 1.5 times longer than the 18v nicad in my experience.(XRP was usefull to 3/4 hour of #10 deck fasteners) I dig the lithium charging: you can pull it off before the "45 miniature" chubby charge, without lobotomizing your battery. Also cool: The packs Beget charge phenominally well; so I can rely on ready stand-by. Ace in the hole.

Bottom line: Light and handy. Short of gasoline fired, you wont salvage better charge storage, but I score the BDF451 kind of spendy for middling torque. $279.00 shipped.

First, let me say that, overall, I like this drill (although I haven't traditional it that noteworthy yet) . It's rapidly, runs long on one charge, and is comfortable. I also really like the chuck - you can tighten and loosen it with one hand without a key and without running the drill. This is very convenient. The storage compartment on the case is nice too. I have a few negative points to build, though:

1. This drill has no hammer mode (Amazon's description says,"Shift Lock Driver System mercurial shifts from 'hammer drill' to 'driver' mode with one touch") I can't get this feature and it's not mentioned in the manual. There is a switch to change from drill mode (max torque) to torque small mode (for driving screws) . That's nice, but it isn't a hammer drill.

2. The light is nice, but it really doesn't point fair on the status your're working on, so it's not as advantageous as it could be.

3. The torque limiting is microscopic at the coarse slay. In other words, even at the lowest setting, you can serene over-drive miniature screws shapely easily.

4. The switch for changing the speeds gets stuck (although the Amazon ad and the manual say this is normal) . You need to lumber the motor a microscopic and try a few times sometimes to rep it to shift. Not a broad deal, but a tiny annoying.

These are all ravishing petite points (unless you really want a hammer drill!), so overall, I'm exquisite joyful with this product.

Product: Polk Audio AM1195-A

List Price: $499.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Polk Audio AM1195-A

I got the I-Sonic 2 honest about a month ago and I am unruffled amazed at how favorable this thing sounds. I got a Bose and a Cambridge at the same time, niether reach conclude and are going serve. It was enormous to do a comparision in my believe home.

I read a lot of reviews on the first I-Sonic; best I can negate Polk has fixed all of the issues. It doesn't obtain hot, the explain is easy to read, and the controls are so simple I have yet to originate the manual.

The iPod dock works with my iPhone and my video iPod and my iPod has never sounded better. Really, you will be blown away by how edifying this system sounds. I have the unit in my bedroom and it is a perfect dwelling to store my iPod when I catch home; keeps it charged all the time.

The HD Radio works well with the single wire antenna provided with the system. I have tagged a bunch of sounds and bought a few from iTunes; very very cold feature even if you honest exhaust it to remeber a song.

I am very jubilant with the system and would highly recommend it to any iPod owner, its a perfect match.

I luxuriate in this system tremendously. Sounds stout for such a shrimp package. The firmware was outdated when I received it, and I speedy found out that Polk Audio no longer provides the firmware on their website for download. It seems too many people were having issues flashing the ROM. Basically because 1) they didn't read the directions and spend a memory stick < 1Gb, and 2) if they had other files on the memory stick the I-Sonic would collect a bit confused. I called Polk Audio and insisted they email me the firmware (They wanted to mail me a memory stick) . I performed the upgrade without any problems using an musty 128Mb stick I had lying around (made obvious nothing else was on it) . So you should be able to question the same from Polk Audio.

You'll have to perceive very hard to derive a shelf unit with better sound than the iSonic ES2...I was blown away by the richness and depth of sound. When you hear companies consume the words "room filling" when describing miniature stereos, you can acquire it where this one is concerned. It can easily vow high-quality sound to multiple rooms, and is helped by the separate bass/treble settings...that's a steady plus compared to similar units that do not have them.

However, I was disappointed in the HD/FM/AM radio functions of this product. Despite multiple attempts and antenna placements, I did not have worthy luck in acheiving consistently obvious sound from the FM band, even less luck with AM and the HD signal was only sporadic. One exiguous it produced improbable sound unprejudiced as advertised, but in the next it would revert to the standard FM signal making the iTunes tagging function useless (iTunes tagging only works in the HD mode) . This flip benefit and forth from HD to FM on the same situation was an annoyance, to say the least.

iPod playback was incredible. The iSonic ES2 delivered a very trim transfer and I was impressed at the lack of noticeable volume loss between the HD radio and iPod audio (I had read about that complaint in other online reviews) . That said, Polk needs to add a playlist toggling capability to the remote. As it stands, switching playlists requires manual adjustment on the iPod itself.

Finally, the clock function did not work. It allowed the time to be station, but upon hitting the time button to ruin the spot function and initiate clock operation, it stayed at the time that was entered.

Overall, I was as impressed as I could be with the sound quality of this unit...it's unsurpassed in this genre and exceeds the Bose Wave. But the shortcomings of its other features and functions left it a disappointment and $500 is simply procedure too great money to utilize on nothing but estimable iPod speakers. Polk would be shiny to regain rid of the HD radio and iTunes tagging and do the CD/DVD player help on the unit (the new iSonic had a CD/DVD drive but for some reason it was removed for the ES2 model) .

Product: Sony SAL50F14

List Price: No List Price Available
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Sony SAL50F14

I bought this lens because I needed a "portrait" lens for my K/M 7D when my Sigma 28-70 f/2.8 EX "Pro" lens took a dump on me. The lens hasn't been dropped or anything like that (that I'm aware of) but it suddenly is always out of focus and won't focus at infinity at all ... but that's a plight for the Sigma people, so I digress.

In need of a reliable "portrait" length lens for my 7D I opted for this Sony 50 f/1.4. I'd had a Maxxum 50 f/1.4 years ago but had gotten rid of it shortly after getting a zoom lens. Gigantic mistake. In any case, because my Sigma lens mentioned above was in need of repair and I had a portrait shoot coming up, I got this lens and I must say it's been a worthwhile investment.

Wide launch the lens is tack spellbinding at point-of-focus. Stopped down between f/2.8 and f/4, doing head and shoulder shots of an average-sized adult the lens provides astounding portraits ... nice incompatibility, glowing color and of course very moving with beautifully de-focused backgrounds.

I shoot a lot of film with Medium format Mamiyas (RZ67 and 7II) and have very high expectations for image quality. With the acquire of this 50 f/1.4 I realized I've been compromising image quality on my 35mm cameras (film and digital) by using "off sign" lenses like Tokina and Sigma. Don't come by me unfriendly. I'm not saying that Tokina and Sigma create flat-out junk. Honest that I didn't realize that the image quality could be better in my 35mm cameras.

Up to now I'd understanding that the sensor in the K/M 7D was objective mediocre. And, I'm positive that some would say it unruffled is. But, I'm here to speak you that this 50 f/1.4 proved to me that the problems I've view were all in the body were in actuality all in the lenses.

I'm in the process of replacing all my off-brand "Pro" lenses with Sony/Minolta and Sony/Zeiss lenses. Today (14Nov07) I purchased a Sony 16mm f/2.8 lens (SAL-16F28) to replace my 17mm Tokina lens. The Tokina lens unbiased doesn't gash it when it comes to image sharpness and resolution. I'm hoping this 16mm will manufacture on-par with my 50 f/1.4. If it does then the next step is a Sony/Zeiss 85 f/1.4 and eventually a Sony/Minolta 80-200 f/2.8 (to replace my Tokina 80-200 f/2.8 ATX PRO) .

I know some people aren't as necessary as I may be about image sharpness, resolution and disagreement. And for those people I say ... to each his bear. But, my experience and expectations are very high and I feel there is no reason to compromise. Employ the extra money and assume the best glass you can ... because it does build a dissimilarity.

One of the best prime lenses ever made, and an advantageous update by Sony to sustain it in the lineup. A gigantic choice for various portrait work even professional, indoor/low light shooting, and for landscapes when a wide angle isn't needed or you take to stitch several images together (distortion free images aid with this greatly) .

Will be an top-notch lens for chubby frame as well, whether by film or the unique upcoming A900.

Highly recommended.

[..]

I bought this lens a while ago and have faded it a lot, mainly doing portrait shots. I must say it surprised me, it's better that I had hoped. It's very brilliant, delivering obvious and curious pictures with spacious colors. I must say that compared to the Canon lenses of similar class, the Sony lens comes out victorious. I really judge that the guys at Sony are doing a stout job with their SLR camera.

(P.s. I'm not working for Sony or anything like that, I'm impartial really joyful with my lens

Product: Yamaha RX-V861BL

List Price: $899.95
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Yamaha RX-V861BL

Love this reciever, plugged legal in and ran out of the box no jam. Expend the HDMI to gaze tv tru the cable and HD Dvd. Only reason not 5 stars is the Upconvert from the analog cable causes the reciever to temporary reset itself and all you peep is a green cover for about 3 seconds. I know its the cable signal cause it doesn't do it in DVD.

I have to say, I was a non-believer. I was debating between Harman-Kardon, Yamaha and Onkyo. I didnt contemplate Yamaha was that immense of a reciever than HK. But man, I was proved so obnoxious that I feel what I have been missing all along. Suddenly the Klipsh, Bose speakers are awake like crazy. I had a Technics before ( I know I was cheap...) but having the 861 made the whole experience like you are immersed in sound, the bass is deep, the distribution is awsome as the sound distribution is position by using the Yamaha mic which detects the errors, distance and adjusts the sound.. I can go on and on but try this out. I was not convinced that a receiver should be more than 500 bux but this monster is better than the Rolex I bought last month!!!!

Bought this receiver a couple of weeks ago online for $399(WMart) to upgrade from a Yamaha RX-V1200 for HDMI abet with a PS3. As other reviewers have stated, easy plot up with auto speaker settings and it sounds large. Only space of surprise is the need to crank up the volume settings higher than expected when playing Blu=Ray movies. It works well with the PS3, Comcast HD-DVR and DVD-Audio via a Panasonic DVD-F87 5 disc changer(5.1 analog inputs) .

Product: Husqvarna 455

List Price: $399.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Husqvarna 455

I impartial picked up a 455 Rancher about a month ago (today is 4 May, 2006) . This is a sizable saw. I had been using for more than 20 years, and composed utilize to some degree a Stihl 028; another pleasant saw.

There are some pros and cons to this saw as with all things.

Here's what I like. It's easy to operate and have. Accessibility of the under-cowel components such as the air filter, spark prance, and clutch housing is a no-brainer. It starts easy. In fact, you really don't need the pressure valve. It "pops" after a few short and hastily pulls. Remember, once the saw "pops" with the choke, un-choke it and pull it again. You do not need to warm a two stroke with the choke on like you would a 4 stroke engine. Attempting to warm with the choke is the biggest cause of two stroke engine flooding.

Here's what I do not like. The low/hi mixture settings are shrimp by EPA regulations; a complete and total joke. If you select the controls to optimize your settings, the warranty is void. But, I reflect it's better to do that than cook engine from lean settings. There aren't enough chainsaws running in any given period of the day to elaborate this regulation. So if you are a casual user, really pay attention to the fracture in procedures. Since the saws accelerate lean, you need to construct clear to smash them in with extra care. If you employ them powerful more frequently, hold the EPA limiters and richen out the hi/low mix, otherwise you will cook your engine.

Overall this is a substantial saw. The chisel chains do well for heavier applications. Be careful of kickback with these style chains. You can secure low-kick befriend chains from any dealer. It's all a matter of personal preference.

I have outfitted my saw with an Oregon 20" Bar, chain, and rim sprocket. Once again this is a personal preference swear. The power head of the 455 is plenty and the applications many. If you are a causal user of this saw, talk with the folks at the saw shops for tips and ideas. They are a repository of knowledge and can back you earn informed decisions about your saw.

-Washington State

Living in Alaska heating oil costs can find titanic. I made a decision this year instead of paying the local hump yard $125 a cord for split spruce; I would acquire care of it myself. After the 1st half cord of wood my broken-down McCullough honest wouldn't cleave it anymore. The local saw shop didn't want to work on it and so I started looking around for a decent saw.

I first purchased a Poulan 18" that was completely worthless. Gas and Oil leaked from the bad cap build while in operation and at rest in it's case. The poulan wouldn't finish running despite all my efforts to obtain it to behave.

I swiftly returned the Poulan and purchased the Husqy 455. I've been very gratified with it's performance to date. It chews through White and Sad smart at insane speeds. I've carve 3 cords with it already and the only predicament I've had to date is after about 45 minutes of cutting the saw will shut off at inactive. I'm assuming this is a possible heating enlighten. If you let the saw rest for 2 minutes it fires true serve up like it never had a scrape. The choke handle is indeed very cheap plastic and I'm taking favorable care to handle it gently.

The saw has already paid for itself and I inquire of to gain many edifying years of service out of it. All in all it's the best saw I've feeble to date; but that's comparing it to Poulan and McCullough.

Ask anyone who has never accelerate the 455 Rancher, or couldn't identify one by inspect if their lives depended on it, and they'll likely say you how dreadful the 455 Rancher is... or that it's a saw that's been on the market for a few years. On paper it's about .7lbs heavier than it's 50-something cc neighbors in the Husqvarna line. On that basis, the experienced professional is likely going to go with the 359 every time. Not only because of the weight factor, but because the 359 is a correct professional saw, whereas the 455 Rancher was always intended to believe a gap between the upper raze homeowner saws and pro saws.

This isn't a professional saw, but it's a fair saw that's a ample choice for serious firewood cutting or whatever you want to throw at it. With an 18" bar, and a respectable chain, this thing blows through wood like butter and is impartial as impressive as any of the Husqvarna saws. The wings on the limiter screws for the carb do weep to be saw off with a Dremel, but other than that, it's a righteous choice for a homeowner who does a beautiful amount of cutting.

I believe that the reputation of this saw may improve significantly in the next year or two as more and more people have the opportunity to actually accelerate one.